[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can we make the *-version functions more consistent?
|
From: |
Dirk Herrmann |
|
Subject: |
Re: Can we make the *-version functions more consistent? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 15 May 2001 03:02:11 +0200 (MEST) |
On 15 May 2001, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Agreed. (I'm more with `micro-version' than `revision', but that's a
> micro point.)
I second this.
> What about adding a _forth_ version indicator, `patch-level'. The
> *-versions could be guaranteed to be numbers, and `patch-level' could
> be any string. People would use the patch-level for locally modified
> versions of Guile and it would normally be empty.
patch-version ?
In any case, a good idea.
Best regards,
Dirk Herrmann