Re: What's the status of modules and macros?

[Marius Vollmer]

Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:

>   - the output will contain no implicit references to module bindings.
>     These will all have been expanded to (module-ref module-name
>     binding).

Yes, except that `(module-ref ...)' might not work since we would have
to look up the symbol `module-ref'.  But where?  That's why I used
`(#:module-ref ...)'.