Re: What's the status of modules and macros?

[Marius Vollmer]

Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:

> OK, so the only things it doesn't really know about, I guess, are
> define-macros, and/or some of the other types of macros (eval-case,
> etc).  It seems to leave those alone.

For `eval-case' I think we need to give the macro expander some flag
to know what branch to expand.  Defmacros should be relativelky easy
to add once we have unbderstood the algorithm and code of psyntax.ss.