[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h) |
Date: |
13 May 2001 11:29:31 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
(Thanks for the summary.)
> - the effort to integrate with the change (within the usual
> deprecation period, of course) falls more on developers using the
> SCM interface than on those using GH, which (by the current
> definition of GH) is as it should be.
I don't have a very strong opinion about which of the paths you've
outlined we should take, but note that your preferred approach might
actually imact a lot of end-users too since the impression I've been
getting is that many of them already came to the conclusion that the
gh_ interface wasn't sufficient and are already using scm_ functions.
I do like the idea of clarifing the gh_ interface's purpose, and it
would be nice if we were able to figure out what we wanted and at
least document it in 1.6.0.
FWIW.
--
Rob Browning <address@hidden> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
- Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h), (continued)
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h), Neil Jerram, 2001/05/02
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h), Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/08