[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stable branch on May 21 feasible?
|
From: |
Rob Browning |
|
Subject: |
Re: Stable branch on May 21 feasible? |
|
Date: |
13 May 2001 10:36:44 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
> Speaking only for myself: I am unlikely to have time to add much new
> documentation this week, and I'm on holiday for two weeks from
> Saturday 19th.
So do you think we should delay? Do you have things pending that you
think should go in before 1.6.0, and are these things mostly
documentation? I'd be comfortable accepting documentation changes up
through the final stages before the actual release.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning <address@hidden> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
- Stable branch on May 21 feasible?, Rob Browning, 2001/05/12
- Re: Stable branch on May 21 feasible?, Neil Jerram, 2001/05/13
- Re: Stable branch on May 21 feasible?,
Rob Browning <=
- Re: Stable branch on May 21 feasible?, Neil Jerram, 2001/05/13
- Re: Stable branch on May 21 feasible?, Rob Browning, 2001/05/13
- thoughts about 1.6 release, Ariel Rios, 2001/05/14
- Re: thoughts about 1.6 release, Rob Browning, 2001/05/14
- Re: thoughts about 1.6 release, Ariel Rios, 2001/05/14
Re: Stable branch on May 21 feasible?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/13
Re: Stable branch on May 21 feasible?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/05/14