[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Planning work
|
From: |
Keisuke Nishida |
|
Subject: |
Re: Planning work |
|
Date: |
Sun, 06 May 2001 14:06:34 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.4.1 (Stand By Me) SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) Emacs/21.0.102 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At 02 May 2001 11:20:44 -0700,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> I don't think imposing a one-time parsing cost at load time is so
> horrible. But a key part is also the portability. I would really
> like something that didn't require compiling and thus separate
> versions, one per architecture.
We are going to compile Scheme code into bytecode as well,
and it is architecture independent. Would it help you?
Keisuke
- Guile compilation (getting started playing around), (continued)
- Re: Guile compilation (getting started playing around), thi, 2001/05/06
- Re: Guile compilation (getting started playing around), thi, 2001/05/07
- Re: Planning work, Rob Browning, 2001/05/09
- Re: Planning work, Rob Browning, 2001/05/09
- Re: Planning work, Rob Browning, 2001/05/09
- Re: Planning work, Chris Cramer, 2001/05/04
- Re: Planning work, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/04
- Re: Planning work,
Keisuke Nishida <=
- Re: Planning work, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/09
Re: Planning work, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/01
Planning work, NIIBE Yutaka, 2001/05/01