Re: Documenting debug facilities

[Neil Jerram]

>>>>> "Neil" == Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:

    Neil> I'd like to improve the documentation for how Guile handles
    Neil> errors, including things like `stack-catch', `make-stack',
    Neil> `backtrace' etc.  My initial survey indicates that doing
    Neil> this properly would naturally pull in a whole load of other
    Neil> stuff, including debug objects, memoized objects, the
    Neil> debugging evaluator, frames, using the debugger
    Neil> (breakpoints? - do they work?), and so on.  (All of which is
    Neil> currently documented very sparingly.)

    Neil> This would be fun to do, but I'd like to know whether all
    Neil> this stuff is stable enough to make it worthwhile?

I've not yet had any response at all for this question.  If anyone has
any idea of the answer, I'd appreciate hearing it.

Does anyone regularly use the Guile debugger, for example?

        Neil