[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm? |
Date: |
24 Apr 2001 14:21:06 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
> I think we do need to. In fact, I think it's a benefit to do so, as
> it creates a precedent that allows us to think more freely about
> reorganizing all the other files in ice-9.
>
> And the nice thing about our deprecation convention is that deprecated
> things will disappear after a few releases.
OK, well, unless anyone complains, I'll probably go ahead this evening
or tomorrow. I'll leave ice-9/receive alone, though, unless people
think that should go away too...
--
Rob Browning <address@hidden> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
- Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/23
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/04/24
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/24
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Neil Jerram, 2001/04/24
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?,
Rob Browning <=
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Neil Jerram, 2001/04/24
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/24
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Neil Jerram, 2001/04/25
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/29
- Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?, Neil Jerram, 2001/04/29