Re: Should we have (srfi srfi-N) modules for all SRFIs?

[Neil Jerram]

>>>>> "Rob" == Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:

    Rob> One argument in favor of that it makes code immune to
    Rob> restructurings.

Hmmm...  But only if people include (use-modules (srfi srfi-N)) in
their code.

If we did this, I'd prefer to see a corresponding extension of the
deprecation system as well such that use of a srfi-N procedure
_without_ the appropriate `use-modules' would issue a warning.

        Neil