[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Document the current module system?
|
From: |
Rob Browning |
|
Subject: |
Re: Document the current module system? |
|
Date: |
20 Apr 2001 10:33:41 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
NIIBE Yutaka <address@hidden> writes:
> On the other hand, the idea of "Recursive Namespaces" is bogus, not
> implemented, in fact. It seems that its intention was supporting
> namespace in namespace of symbol. Note that it's *not* the namespace
> of module name. I guess that idea is like that: Symbols defined and
> exported by the module (oop goops) are in the scope for the modules
> under (oop goops), such as (oop goops stklos) automagically.
Eeeew. Presuming I properly understand what you're saying, I don't
think I like that either.
--
Rob Browning <address@hidden> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
Document the current module system?, NIIBE Yutaka, 2001/04/19
- Re: Document the current module system?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/04/19
- Re: Document the current module system?,
Rob Browning <=
- Re: Document the current module system?, NIIBE Yutaka, 2001/04/23
- Re: Document the current module system?, NIIBE Yutaka, 2001/04/23
- Re: Document the current module system?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/04/23
- Recursive namespace, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/04/23
- Recursive namespace, NIIBE Yutaka, 2001/04/23
- Re: Recursive namespace, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/04/24
- Re: Recursive namespace, Alex Shinn, 2001/04/24
- Interface should be determined at compile time, NIIBE Yutaka, 2001/04/24
- Re: Recursive namespace, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/29
Re: Recursive namespace, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/04/24