[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile-vm 0.3
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: guile-vm 0.3 |
Date: |
10 Apr 2001 00:03:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 |
Evan Prodromou <address@hidden> writes:
> This seems to be the Right Thing: compile to VM code, and then
> JIT-compile to Lightning if possible.
I was more thinking about: compile to native using Lightning (ignoring
its JIT focus), or to bytecodes if needed. That is, we would have a
(run-time) retargetable compiler that can either generate native code
via Lightning, or bytecodes for a VM. I don't think bytecodes that
are tuned for performance are a good intermediate language.
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, (continued)
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/05
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Miroslav Silovic, 2001/04/06
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Rob Browning, 2001/04/09
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/09
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Rob Browning, 2001/04/09
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Rob Browning, 2001/04/05
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Ariel Rios, 2001/04/05
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Rob Browning, 2001/04/06
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/09
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Evan Prodromou, 2001/04/09
- Re: guile-vm 0.3,
Marius Vollmer <=
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Rob Browning, 2001/04/09
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/09
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Rob Browning, 2001/04/09
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/04/11
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Evan Prodromou, 2001/04/11
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Rob Browning, 2001/04/11
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/12
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Michael Livshin, 2001/04/12
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Rob Browning, 2001/04/12
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/04/12