Re: Thread support plan with initial patch

[Neil Jerram]

>>>>> "NIIBE Yutaka" == NIIBE Yutaka <address@hidden> writes:

    NIIBE Yutaka> Here's my plan of introducing POSIX thread support:

Good news that you're working on this again!  I have a question about
one detail...

    NIIBE Yutaka>       Note that we're not interrupted asynchronously
    NIIBE Yutaka> by signal any more, all the signals are handled
    NIIBE Yutaka> synchronously.

Why is this, and will this be the case for all thread implementations,
or only POSIX?  Only a few days ago there was a discussion here (or
perhaps guile-user) in broad support for the asynchronous approach.

Best regards,
        Neil