[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What's the current recommendation for speeding up bits of guile code
From: |
Martin Grabmueller |
Subject: |
Re: What's the current recommendation for speeding up bits of guile code. |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:03:57 +0100 |
> From: Rob Browning <address@hidden>
> Date: 20 Mar 2001 15:58:49 -0600
>
> Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > OK. Thanks, I may play with that and see what happens.
>
> Easier than I thought. There was some automake, etc. bitrot, but
> after I got past that, hobbit seemed to build/install/work. I also
> (at least temporarily) switched it from being an slib "provided"
> module to a normal guile (use-modules (ghobbit)) style module.
>
> Should this go into CVS?
I am quite interested in that module. What is currently possible with
it? I suppose you can compile self-contained Scheme source files to
C. Can you build shared objects, which can then be loaded
dynamically, just like hand-coded C modules?
I think this would be quite useful, even if there is no support for
the current module system, because we could code quite a lot of code
(such as the SRFIs) in Scheme, compile them to machine code and then
load them via Scheme modules.
Regards,
'martin
- What's the current recommendation for speeding up bits of guile code., Rob Browning, 2001/03/19
- Re: What's the current recommendation for speeding up bits of guile code., Marius Vollmer, 2001/03/23
- Re: What's the current recommendation for speeding up bits of guile code., Rob Browning, 2001/03/23
- guile performance too slow for gnucash?, Neil W. Van Dyke, 2001/03/23
- Re: guile performance too slow for gnucash?, Rob Browning, 2001/03/23
Re: What's the current recommendation for speeding up bits of guile code., Keisuke Nishida, 2001/03/20