Re: Procedure proposal: call-with-escape-procedure

[Martin Grabmueller]

> From: Marius Vollmer <address@hidden>
> Date: 06 Mar 2001 13:41:44 +0100
> 
> > I don't claim to understand all possible semantic implications, but
> > as call/ec is included in the suggestion, I am happy with that.  But
> > of course I am interested in the `implement them efficiently' part,
> > because that got the whole thing started ;-)
> 
> Yeah, got carried away, sorry.  Your original implementation seemed
> fine.  But in the light of all this, I would not want to add it to
> Guile until we know what it will do precisely.  Your implementation
> seems easy enough that you can just put it into the programs that
> needs it, right?

Right, but I thought call/ec might by of general interest, that's why
I suggested to include it into the distribution.

And if we're getting a better version in the future, I'll be happy
with that, of course.

Regards,
  'martin