Re: Documentation

[Marius Vollmer]

Michael Livshin <address@hidden> writes:

> * generally, when thinking up such things, it would be wise (IMHO) to
>   pretend that Guile already has a compiler.  this is because, despite
>   the mounting evidence to the contrary ;), I still believe that we
>   are going to have one.  so introducing hairy stuff that helps the
>   current interpreter-only situation but is useless with a compiler
>   should be done with extreme caution or not done at all.

Yes, very much agreed.
 
>   I don't believe this to be a serious problem, actually.  and it is
>   trivially solved by a compiler.  [...]

Except that the compiler is not at all trivial...