[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C level variants of make-vector / make-string
|
From: |
Keisuke Nishida |
|
Subject: |
Re: C level variants of make-vector / make-string |
|
Date: |
Fri, 09 Feb 2001 13:03:05 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) Emacs/21.0.96 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Fri, 9 Feb 2001 11:31:48 +0100 (MET),
Dirk Herrmann wrote:
>
> The question is, is it a good idea to name this function scm_c_make_string
> if it does not do any initialization, while scm_make_string potentially
> does? Or should it rather be named like
> scm_make_uninitialized_string,
> scm_make_string_noinit,
> scm_make_string_nofill
> or something else? I'd like to be sure about the name before committing.
> (I also like long names :-)
What about scm_c_allocate_string?