[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gh_ vs. scm_ Interfaces
|
From: |
Chris Cramer |
|
Subject: |
Re: gh_ vs. scm_ Interfaces |
|
Date: |
Tue, 9 Jan 2001 21:00:22 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 08:45:09PM +0000, Neil Jerram wrote:
> Another consideration ISTR is the idea that the gh interface could be
> implemented by a completely different interpreter than Guile, and that
> therefore, if you wrote an extension using only the gh interface, you
> could plug in any interpreter that implemented the gh interface.
> Realistically, I very much doubt that this will ever happen, so I
> think that we should drop this angle.
Actually, MzScheme supports the gh interface.
--
C. Ray C. aka Christopher Cramer
address@hidden
http://www.pyro.net/~crayc/