Re: API for introduction of bindings

[Mikael Djurfeldt]

address@hidden writes:

> At 17 Dec 2000 20:00:38 +0100,
> Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
> > 
> > I suggest that we instead focus on the problem of dividing the current
> > set of bindings into a nice hierarchy of modules, like
> > "(core safe-r5rs)", "(core r5rs)", etc.  (I think Maciej and Jim had a
> > preliminary proposal, Maciej? Jim?)
> 
> I'd prefer modules like "(core list)", "(core string)", etc. according
> to their functionality rather than standards.  We can build standard
> modules like "(scheme r5rs)" by importing the core modules and exporting
> necessary bindings, right?

That's certainly possible.

Is this useful?  (It's not meant as a rhetoric question.)