Re: Optimization of applicable smobs

[Dirk Herrmann]

On 6 Dec 2000, Keisuke Nishida wrote:

> Mikael Djurfeldt <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> >    * Note now the possibility for a nice optimization:
> >
> >      If the function stored in `apply' takes, for example, two
> >      required arguments, then the *function itself* can be stored in
> >      `trampoline2', and we have eliminated one level of indirection.

I have applied a patch that performs the suggested optimization.  Further,
I made the signature parameters unsigned, which somewhat simplifies the
code.  If you agree with it, I can submit it or you can just integrate it
with your current changes regarding the deprecation of mfpe.

Best regards,
Dirk Herrmann

smobdiff
Description: Text document