Re: libguile/goops.c

[Michael Livshin]

"Dale P. Smith" <address@hidden> writes:

> Michael Livshin wrote:
> > 
> > "Lars J. Aas" <address@hidden> writes:
> > 
> > > I see that the keywords "class", "template", "new", "delete", "private" 
> > > and
> > > "mutable" are used as variable names in libguile/goops.c.  These are all
> > > reserved keywords in C++, so compiling guile with a C++ compiler is at the
> > > moment impossible...
> > 
> > and what would be the point of doing it, anyway?
> 
> Doesn't scwm require guile to be compiled as c++ if configured to use
> constraints?

I don't remember any such requirement, but then I last used SCWM a
year ago.

the mind boggles at the thought.

-- 
"Tools that are no good require more skill."