[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: IEEE floating point support for guile?]
From: |
Gerald Jay Sussman |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: IEEE floating point support for guile?] |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Nov 2000 18:22:08 -0500 |
I want my numerical programs to be predictable and reliable, so...
I want to know when I divide by zero! I want to know when I overflow
or underflow!
Sometimes a NaN is the right thing, but most of the time it is not the
right thing. Most of the time it is a signal that I have a
singularity or other bad problem that needs special attention. But I
cannot afford to test every operation for overflow or underflow, so I
need the exceptions, so I can provide routines that decide,
intelligently, what I want to happen in each case.
And, I want the standard IEEE rounding rules in place. I don't want
to do arithmetic with 80 bits in the chip and 64 bits in memory. I
want the 64 bit mode unless I explicitly ask for 80 bit accumulations!
- Re: address@hidden: IEEE floating point support for guile?],
Gerald Jay Sussman <=