[SCM] GNU gsasl branch, master, updated. gsasl-1-7-5-4-ga688a2a

[Simon Josefsson]

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU gsasl".

http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gsasl.git/commit/?id=a688a2a82b41a42132cdbb552f7449820f2d402e

The branch, master has been updated
       via  a688a2a82b41a42132cdbb552f7449820f2d402e (commit)
      from  497bef48a36fb8bf2afbb1695ff11d25a8e96c5e (commit)

Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.

- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit a688a2a82b41a42132cdbb552f7449820f2d402e
Author: Simon Josefsson <address@hidden>
Date:   Tue May 22 19:39:15 2012 +0200

    Silence pure/const attribute warnings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of changes:
 configure.ac |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index ceb45f5..a862aea 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -131,6 +131,8 @@ if test "$gl_gcc_warnings" = yes; then
   nw="$nw -Wtraditional"            # Warns on #elif which we use often
   nw="$nw -Wtraditional-conversion" # Too many warnings for now
   nw="$nw -Wunreachable-code"       # Too many false positives
+  nw="$nw -Wsuggest-attribute=pure" # Is it worth using attributes?
+  nw="$nw -Wsuggest-attribute=const" # Is it worth using attributes?
 
   gl_MANYWARN_ALL_GCC([ws])
   gl_MANYWARN_COMPLEMENT(ws, [$ws], [$nw])


hooks/post-receive
-- 
GNU gsasl