Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] fs/iso9660: Add check to prevent infinite loop

[Thomas Schmitt]

Hi,

On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 08:23:54 +0000 Lidong Chen <lidong.chen@oracle.com> wrote:
> There is no check for the end of block when reading
> directory extents. It resulted in read_node() always
> read from the same offset in the while loop, thus
> caused infinite loop. The fix added a check for the
> end of the block and ensure the read is within directory
> boundary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lidong Chen <lidong.chen@oracle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Schmitt <scdbackup@gmx.net>
> ---
>  grub-core/fs/iso9660.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/grub-core/fs/iso9660.c b/grub-core/fs/iso9660.c
> index 91817ec1f..4f4cd6165 100644
> --- a/grub-core/fs/iso9660.c
> +++ b/grub-core/fs/iso9660.c
> @@ -795,6 +795,15 @@ grub_iso9660_iterate_dir (grub_fshelp_node_t dir,
>       while (dirent.flags & FLAG_MORE_EXTENTS)
>         {
>           offset += dirent.len;
> +
> +         /* offset should within the dir's len. */
> +         if (offset > len)
> +           {
> +             if (ctx.filename_alloc)
> +               grub_free (ctx.filename);
> +             return 0;
> +           }
> +
>           if (read_node (dir, offset, sizeof (dirent), (char *) &dirent))
>             {
>               if (ctx.filename_alloc)
> @@ -802,6 +811,18 @@ grub_iso9660_iterate_dir (grub_fshelp_node_t dir,
>               grub_free (node);
>               return 0;
>             }
> +
> +         /*
> +          * It is either the end of block or zero-padded sector,
> +          * skip to the next block.
> +          */
> +         if (!dirent.len)
> +           {
> +             offset = (offset / GRUB_ISO9660_BLKSZ + 1) * GRUB_ISO9660_BLKSZ;
> +             dirent.flags |= FLAG_MORE_EXTENTS;
> +             continue;
> +           }
> +
>           if (node->have_dirents >= node->alloc_dirents)
>             {
>               struct grub_fshelp_node *new_node;
> --
> 2.35.1

Reviewed-by: Thomas Schmitt <scdbackup@gmx.net>

(I'm not sure whether is appropriate to add another Reviewed-by after it
was already given and only a minor cosmetic change was made to the patch.
If this is not ok, then please give me a note.)


Have a nice day :)

Thomas