grub-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

GRUB 2.06


From: Didier Spaier
Subject: GRUB 2.06
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 21:28:40 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0

I am fine with shipping GRUB up to some commit in Slint, but not all
distributions accept to do that, or to carry a zillion patches as does Debian.

As result, end users complain "GRUB is broken" whereas a patch that fix the
issue of which they suffer of has been committed upstream a long time ago.

An example that comes to mind is:
6643507ce30f775008e093580f0c9499dfb2c485

Folks running Slackware-current also suffer of it:
https://https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/requests-for-current-14-2-15-0-a-4175620463/#post6236544www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/requests-for-current-14-2-15-0-a-4175620463/#post6236544

Best regards
Didier

Le 08/04/2021 à 18:53, Daniel Kiper a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 07:11:51PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
The first patch adds a long overdue note to the cryptomount command that UUIDs
should be specified without dash, differently than how fs uuids are specified.

The second patch makes the indentation of command description text for cutmem
and badmem conform with the indentation of the rest of the commands.

Glenn

Glenn Washburn (2):
   docs: Add note to cryptomount that UUIDs should be specified without
     dashes
   docs: Conform badmem and cutmem description indentations with other
     commands

Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>

Daniel

_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]