Re: [PATCH REBASED] verify: search keyid in hashed signature subpackets

[Daniel Axtens]

Daniel Kiper <dkiper@net-space.pl> writes:

> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 02:10:46PM +1000, Daniel Axtens wrote:
>> Charles Duffy <charles@dyfis.net> writes:
>>
>> > Amended the test repo to apply this patch; it applies and works-as-intended
>> > on both 2.04 and current master.
>> >
>> > As for the DCO assertions, my portion of the contribution was implemented
>> > strictly on personal time/equipment, so I'm able to to make the relevant
>> > assertions in my individual capacity; amended below thusly.
>>
>> Awesome, me too.
>
> Oh, nice to see that work revived...
>
>> >> (Add further description per thread at
>> >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2016-11/msg00073.html)
>>
>> I will leave doing further revisions to you - looking through the thread
>> from 2016 it looks like the commit message needs more details and maybe
>> some variable names and constants need to be cleaned up etc. Now that we
>> have all the relevant Signed-off-bys, that should all be just a matter of
>> programming. My understanding is that you should maintain all three
>
> You mean that I have to wait for next version of it...

I looked back at the 2016 thread and you had some comments there about
the clarity of the code and the details in the commit message. I imagine
those comments still stand. I was just trying to be clear to Charles
that I wasn't going to take on the task of addressing those comments,
and that he should address those and respin the patch.

>
>> S-O-Bs in the commit message for future spins, but I've never been clear
>> on what order they should be in if you make further revisions.
>
> Well, it seems to me that it depends on the project and maintainers
> preference. I prefer the oldest SOB at the top. So, in this case:
>
>   Signed-off-by: Ignat Korchagin <ignat@cloudflare.com>
>   Signed-off-by: Charles Duffy <charles@dyfis.net>
>   Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>

Noted.

Regards,
Daniel