Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Support Argon2 KDF in LUKS2

[Patrick Steinhardt]

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 01:26:20PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 07:00:48PM +0100, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> > One thing I'm not sure about here is whether it's fine to declare the
> > argon2 mod's license as GPLv3. The code is licensed under CC0/Apache
> > 2.0, where the latter is compatible with GPLv3. But I don't know whether
> > it's legit to just say "Yeah, this mod is a GPLv3 one".
> 
> Could you give me a reference to the doc/spec or what not which says that
> it is legit to do that? I will consult this with GNU legal folks.

With "that" you probably mean combining Apache 2.0 and GPLv3, right?
I've taken this from GNU's list of licenses [1], which explicitly
mentions Apache 2.0 as compatible with version 3 of the GNU GPL.

Patrick

[1]: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#apache2

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature