grub-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] grub-install: check for arm-efi as a default target


From: Steve McIntyre
Subject: Re: [PATCH] grub-install: check for arm-efi as a default target
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:53:48 +0000
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 03:23:55PM +0100, dann frazier wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 12:42 PM Leif Lindholm <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 02:42:34AM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> > Much like on x86, we can work out if the system is running on top of
>> > EFI firmware. If so, return "arm-efi". If not, fall back to
>> > "arm-uboot" as previously.
>>
>> Right, this clearly needs a fix.
>>
>> > Heavily inspired by the existing code for x86.
>>
>> Mmm. I would much prefer if we could break out the efi test in a
>> separate helper function. And clean it up while we're at it.
>
>fyi, I made an attempt at this a while back:
>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2018-08/msg00082.html
>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2018-08/msg00081.html
>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2018-08/msg00083.html

Arg, sorry - never saw those or I'd have commented already. :-/

Looking now:

 * I'm not sure I'd bother with the is_efi() change in the
   Windows-specific code but meh. :-)

 * You're only allowing arm-efi as a default when is_virt() is
   true. While I'm also *initially* caring about armhf VMs myself, I
   think that changes in recent U-Boot mean that arm-efi is a sensible
   option on bare metal too?

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                address@hidden
You lock the door
And throw away the key
There's someone in my head but it's not me 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]