grub-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2] grub-install: Mention *efibootmgr* in `no-nvram` descript


From: Daniel Kiper
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] grub-install: Mention *efibootmgr* in `no-nvram` description
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 19:58:06 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 04:18:45PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Daniel,
>
>
> On 09/19/18 16:08, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 08:37:50PM +0300, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko 
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, 6 Sep 2018, 17:03 Paul Menzel, <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 15:15:45 +0200
> >>>
> >>> If executing `efibootmgr` fails, for example, because the system is
> >>> booted in legacy mode, but with a mounted EFI System Partition, the
> >>> error message mentions *efibootmgr*. To make it easier for users to work
> >>> around that problem by skipping running `efibootmgr`, add the word to
> >>> the description of the switch *no-nvram*, which skips the efibootmgr
> >>> execution.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <address@hidden>
> >>> ---
> >>> v2: Add Signed-off-by line
> >>>
> >>>  util/grub-install.c | 2 +-
> >>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/util/grub-install.c b/util/grub-install.c
> >>> index a44858198..335662a58 100644
> >>> --- a/util/grub-install.c
> >>> +++ b/util/grub-install.c
> >>> @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static struct argp_option options[] = {
> >>>     N_("disk module to use (biosdisk or native). "
> >>>        "This option is only available on BIOS target."), 2},
> >>>    {"no-nvram", OPTION_NO_NVRAM, 0, 0,
> >>> -   N_("don't update the `boot-device'/`Boot*' NVRAM variables. "
> >>> +   N_("don't run efibootmgr to update the `boot-device'/`Boot*' NVRAM
> >>> variables. "
> >>>        "This option is only available on EFI and IEEE1275 targets."), 2},
> >>>
> >> In case of ieee1275 this has nothing to do with efibootmgr
> >
> > Paul, are you going to repost the patch with relevant change in the code
> > and commit message or should I fix it just before push?
>
> I am still thinking how to phrase it. Maybe, just add efibootmanager
> after EFI?

What about "don't update, e.g. using efibootmgr, the `boot-device'/`Boot*' 
NVRAM variables. "?

Daniel



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]