[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: grub-install deleting long UEFI entries bug ?
From: |
Andrei Borzenkov |
Subject: |
Re: grub-install deleting long UEFI entries bug ? |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Apr 2017 11:45:46 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 |
23.04.2017 11:21, adrian15 adrian15 пишет:
> 2017-04-23 6:36 GMT+02:00 Andrei Borzenkov <address@hidden>:
>
>> 23.04.2017 03:54, adrian15 пишет:
>>> grub-install seems to be deleting long UEFI entries
>>>
>>> (*) What the bug is
>>>
>>> * Add an UEFI entry with this label (Remove the single quotes):
>>> '(Rescapp added) \EFI\ubuntu\MokManager.efi'
>>>
>>> Example:
>>>
>>> efibootmgr -c \
>>> -d /dev/sda \
>>> -p 2 \
>>> -L '(Rescapp added) \EFI\ubuntu\MokManager.efi' \
>>> -l '\EFI\ubuntu\MokManager.efi'
>>>
>>> * Run grub-install /dev/sda or maybe just grub-install
>>>
>>> I expect the newly added uefi entry to be there.
>>> What I find is that the entry has been lost or deleted!
>>>
>>
>> What is value of GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR in /etc/default/grub?
>>
>
> After evaluating the bash expression the GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR value is Ubuntu.
>
Yes, historically grub did case insensitive substring search. This
probably is wrong, we should just take everything after boot number
literally.
...
> 1) First of all this matches all the line:
>
> if (!strcasestr (line, efi_distributor))
> continue;
>
> That means that if you add a custom label which matches the efi distributor
> then it gets removed. I think that's what happened to me. I would prefer
> something more precise that would check the complete efi file path agains
> e.g. EFI/vendor/ .
>
> 2) Then there's:
>
> if (grub_memcmp (line, "Boot", sizeof ("Boot") - 1) != 0
> || line[sizeof ("Boot") - 1] < '0'
> || line[sizeof ("Boot") - 1] > '9')
> continue;
>
> which might be wrong because of 0 and 9 and maybe not because of the array
> indexes.
>
> Let's go into details about that.
>
> 2.1) Boot0000 First entry
> BootA000 Second entry
>
> Shouldn't the look for A to F hexadecimal letters too?
>
Yes. Patches are welcome for both problems. Second one is actually bug
fix so should be independent.
> And...
>
> 2.2) line[sizeof ("Boot") - 1] < '0'
>
> Am I doing it right?
>
> sizeof ("Boot") = 4
>
It is 5.