[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]
From: |
Peter Jones |
Subject: |
Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1] |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Mar 2016 16:03:32 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 07:57:21PM +0000, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> > > > Well, I have a bunch of patches that need to be clean up (or even
> > > > re-examined), and I've also got the secure-boot branch here:
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/vathpela/grub2-fedora/tree/sb
> > > >
> > > > Which is all the patches distros should be carrying to work with Secure
> > > > Boot correctly. This branch is also recently rebased against master,
> > > > though I'm not sure what the current thinking is regarding their path
> > > > upstream.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Personally I'd rather include support for it. I'm tired of linux vs.
> > > linuxefi nightmare, and patches have been in the wild long enough.
> >
> > So what's the path forward, then? Just make all efi use linuxefi, like
> > linux vs linux16? That's pretty close to what I've got already, except
> > on arm where it's just "linux" in EFI mode as well. But we could make
> > those aliases for the same thing on that platform easily enough. Or do
> > you have something else in mind?
>
> RedHat/Fedora config is too platform-dependent and platform is detected at
> mkconfig time rather than at runtime. This is a problem as runtime and
> mkconfig can be different. Case that I see often is coreboot failing due to
> use of Linux16 (which is a valid protocol for coreboot and is used for
> memtest but Linux crashes with it) but other cases exist, like enabling or
> disabling of SCM or moving disk to another computer. Can we fix this by
> introducing some helper to detect it on runtime? It can either be a
> function or a real command
Yeah, we can do something in the config file based on a platform
variable, and then setting the actual commands that way.
I'm curious as to why you think "linux16" doesn't work for Linux,
though. We use it 100% of the time in Fedora and RHEL, and upstream x86
kernel maintainers have expressed a preference for it. Using "linux"
instead seems to break much more, for example EDD often does not ever
get exposed to the kernel when it's used.
--
Peter
- Re: Linux loader EFI handover, (continued)
- Re: Linux loader EFI handover, Andrei Borzenkov, 2016/03/11
- Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1], Matt Fleming, 2016/03/07
- Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1], Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2016/03/11
- Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1], Matt Fleming, 2016/03/14
- Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1], Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2016/03/15
- Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1], Peter Jones, 2016/03/22
- Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1], Peter Jones, 2016/03/07
- Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1], Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2016/03/07
- Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1], Peter Jones, 2016/03/07
- Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1], Andrei Borzenkov, 2016/03/11
- Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1],
Peter Jones <=
- Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1], Andrei Borzenkov, 2016/03/07
- Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1], Peter Jones, 2016/03/07
- Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1], Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2016/03/07
- Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1], Andrei Borzenkov, 2016/03/08
- Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1], Peter Jones, 2016/03/08
- Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1], Andrei Borzenkov, 2016/03/11
Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1], Olaf Hering, 2016/03/09