Re: [PATCH v2 10/23] efi: build xen.gz with EFI code

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 26.08.15 at 14:33, <address@hidden> wrote:
> Do you suggest that I should put this functionality (PE with multiboot
> headers) on top of this patch series? Well, it is possible but this
> series is big and I would like to avoid to make it bigger. I prefer to
> get current patches into Xen tree and then work on new features (it
> should not take so long because as I can see we almost agreed most
> of stuff in that case). Or if at least half patches of current series
> will be accepted (as I can see there is a chance to do that with v3)
> then I can work on this functionality and put it on top of second not
> applied part. Does it make sense?

Yes. I'm not objecting to deferring that part. All I want is you to make
sure not to submit any changes potentially conflicting with the end
goal of having a single binary (which as I understand it can only be a
PE one).

Jan