[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ELF check: GRUB_ERR_BAD_FILE_TYPE vs. GRUB_ERR_BAD_OS
|
From: |
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko |
|
Subject: |
Re: ELF check: GRUB_ERR_BAD_FILE_TYPE vs. GRUB_ERR_BAD_OS |
|
Date: |
Sat, 25 Jul 2015 13:52:09 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 |
On 24.07.2015 20:50, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> There are two places using GRUB_ERR_BAD_FILE_TYPE and other are using
> GRUB_ERR_BAD_OS when EFL class check fails. I am not sure about exact
> semantics of either but probably they should be the same?
>
BAD_FILE_TYPE is only for errors like EISDIR and ENODIR. BAD_OS should
be used for invalid ELF contents or BAD_MODULE if elf code is primarily
meant to load GRUB-shipped ELFs.
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature