[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader
From: |
Stefano Stabellini |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Mar 2015 17:21:15 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) |
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> We need more fine grained knowledge about EFI environment and check
> for EFI platform and EFI loader separately to properly support
> multiboot2 protocol. In general Xen loaded by this protocol uses
> memory mappings and loaded modules in simliar way to Xen loaded
> by multiboot (v1) protocol. Hence, split efi_enabled to efi_platform
> and efi_loader.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper <address@hidden>
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/dmi_scan.c | 4 ++--
> xen/arch/x86/domain_page.c | 2 +-
> xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c | 5 +++--
> xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c | 4 ++--
> xen/arch/x86/setup.c | 8 ++++----
> xen/arch/x86/time.c | 2 +-
> xen/common/efi/boot.c | 5 +++++
> xen/common/efi/runtime.c | 5 +++--
> xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c | 2 +-
> xen/include/xen/efi.h | 6 +++++-
> 10 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/dmi_scan.c b/xen/arch/x86/dmi_scan.c
> index 500133a..63b976c 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/dmi_scan.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/dmi_scan.c
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ int __init dmi_get_table(u32 *base, u32 *len)
> struct dmi_eps eps;
> char __iomem *p, *q;
>
> - if (efi_enabled) {
> + if (efi_platform) {
> if (!efi_dmi_size)
> return -1;
> *base = efi_dmi_address;
> @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ static void __init dmi_decode(struct dmi_header *dm)
>
> void __init dmi_scan_machine(void)
> {
> - if ((!efi_enabled ? dmi_iterate(dmi_decode) :
> + if ((!efi_platform ? dmi_iterate(dmi_decode) :
> dmi_efi_iterate(dmi_decode)) == 0)
> dmi_check_system(dmi_blacklist);
> else
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domain_page.c b/xen/arch/x86/domain_page.c
> index 158a164..5d4564c 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain_page.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain_page.c
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static inline struct vcpu *mapcache_current_vcpu(void)
> sync_local_execstate();
> /* We must now be running on the idle page table. */
> ASSERT((cr3 = read_cr3()) == __pa(idle_pg_table) ||
> - (efi_enabled && cr3 == efi_rs_page_table()));
> + (efi_platform && cr3 == efi_rs_page_table()));
> }
>
> return v;
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c b/xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c
> index b8f49f8..5060e6f 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c
> @@ -3,8 +3,9 @@
> #include <xen/init.h>
> #include <xen/lib.h>
>
> -#ifndef efi_enabled
> -const bool_t efi_enabled = 0;
> +#ifndef efi_platform
> +bool_t efi_platform = 0;
> +bool_t efi_loader = 0;
> #endif
>
> void __init efi_init_memory(void) { }
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c b/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c
> index a38e016..c4e3041 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c
> @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ static inline void __init
> construct_default_ISA_mptable(int mpc_default_type)
>
> static __init void efi_unmap_mpf(void)
> {
> - if (efi_enabled)
> + if (efi_platform)
> __set_fixmap(FIX_EFI_MPF, 0, 0);
> }
>
> @@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ void __init find_smp_config (void)
> {
> unsigned int address;
>
> - if (efi_enabled) {
> + if (efi_platform) {
> efi_check_config();
> return;
> }
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
> index c27c49c..711fdb0 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
> @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static void __init parse_video_info(void)
> struct boot_video_info *bvi = &bootsym(boot_vid_info);
>
> /* The EFI loader fills vga_console_info directly. */
> - if ( efi_enabled )
> + if ( efi_platform )
> return;
>
> if ( (bvi->orig_video_isVGA == 1) && (bvi->orig_video_mode == 3) )
> @@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ void __init noreturn __start_xen(unsigned long mbi_p)
> if ( ((unsigned long)cpu0_stack & (STACK_SIZE-1)) != 0 )
> panic("Misaligned CPU0 stack.");
>
> - if ( efi_enabled )
> + if ( efi_loader )
> {
> set_pdx_range(xen_phys_start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> (xen_phys_start + BOOTSTRAP_MAP_BASE) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> @@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ void __init noreturn __start_xen(unsigned long mbi_p)
> * we can relocate the dom0 kernel and other multiboot modules. Also, on
> * x86/64, we relocate Xen to higher memory.
> */
> - for ( i = 0; !efi_enabled && i < mbi->mods_count; i++ )
> + for ( i = 0; !efi_loader && i < mbi->mods_count; i++ )
> {
> if ( mod[i].mod_start & (PAGE_SIZE - 1) )
> panic("Bootloader didn't honor module alignment request.");
> @@ -962,7 +962,7 @@ void __init noreturn __start_xen(unsigned long mbi_p)
>
> if ( !xen_phys_start )
> panic("Not enough memory to relocate Xen.");
> - reserve_e820_ram(&boot_e820, efi_enabled ? mbi->mem_upper :
> __pa(&_start),
> + reserve_e820_ram(&boot_e820, efi_loader ? mbi->mem_upper : __pa(&_start),
> __pa(&_end));
>
> /* Late kexec reservation (dynamic start address). */
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/time.c b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
> index 74c01e3..cdd17cb 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
> @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ static unsigned long get_cmos_time(void)
> static bool_t __read_mostly cmos_rtc_probe;
> boolean_param("cmos-rtc-probe", cmos_rtc_probe);
>
> - if ( efi_enabled )
> + if ( efi_platform )
> {
> res = efi_get_time();
> if ( res )
> diff --git a/xen/common/efi/boot.c b/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> index ac6881e..8aafcfd 100644
> --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> @@ -708,6 +708,11 @@ efi_start(EFI_HANDLE ImageHandle, EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE
> *SystemTable)
> char *option_str;
> bool_t use_cfg_file;
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_ARM /* TODO - disabled until implemented on ARM */
> + efi_platform = 1;
> + efi_loader = 1;
> +#endif
What exactly needs to be implemented on ARM? I thought that EFI ARM
support for Xen is pretty much complete.
> efi_ih = ImageHandle;
> efi_bs = SystemTable->BootServices;
> efi_rs = SystemTable->RuntimeServices;
> diff --git a/xen/common/efi/runtime.c b/xen/common/efi/runtime.c
> index c840e08..b229c69 100644
> --- a/xen/common/efi/runtime.c
> +++ b/xen/common/efi/runtime.c
> @@ -11,13 +11,14 @@ DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(CHAR16);
> #ifndef COMPAT
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM /* Disabled until runtime services implemented */
> -const bool_t efi_enabled = 0;
> +const bool_t efi_platform = 0;
> #else
> # include <asm/i387.h>
> # include <asm/xstate.h>
> # include <public/platform.h>
>
> -const bool_t efi_enabled = 1;
> +bool_t efi_platform = 0;
> +bool_t efi_loader = 0;
> #endif
>
> unsigned int __read_mostly efi_num_ct;
> diff --git a/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> index 93c983c..b066459 100644
> --- a/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ void __init acpi_os_vprintf(const char *fmt, va_list args)
>
> acpi_physical_address __init acpi_os_get_root_pointer(void)
> {
> - if (efi_enabled) {
> + if (efi_platform) {
> if (efi.acpi20 != EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR)
> return efi.acpi20;
> else if (efi.acpi != EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR)
> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/efi.h b/xen/include/xen/efi.h
> index 5e02724..54cd390 100644
> --- a/xen/include/xen/efi.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/efi.h
> @@ -5,7 +5,11 @@
> #include <xen/types.h>
> #endif
>
> -extern const bool_t efi_enabled;
> +/* If true then Xen runs on EFI platform. */
> +extern bool_t efi_platform;
> +
> +/* If true then Xen was loaded by native EFI loader as PE application. */
> +extern bool_t efi_loader;
>
> #define EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR (~0UL)
>
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
- Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader,
Stefano Stabellini <=
- Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader, Daniel Kiper, 2015/03/27
- Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader, Jan Beulich, 2015/03/27
- Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader, Andrew Cooper, 2015/03/27
- Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader, Jan Beulich, 2015/03/27
- Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader, Lennart Sorensen, 2015/03/27
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader, Jan Beulich, 2015/03/27
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader, Lennart Sorensen, 2015/03/27