Re: aarch64: relocation 0x105 is not implemented yet.

[Leif Lindholm]

On 29 December 2013 05:24, Andrey Borzenkov <address@hidden> wrote:
> В Вс, 29/12/2013 в 01:55 +0000, Leif Lindholm пишет:
>> It shouldn't, but difficult to say without knowing more details.
>> Can you run the mkimage with -v and pinpoint the triggering module?
>
> This comes from .eh_frame section and fails for kernel.exec already.
>
> RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.eh_frame]:
> OFFSET           TYPE              VALUE
> 000000000000001c R_AARCH64_PREL32  .text+0x0000000000009b70
> 0000000000000044 R_AARCH64_PREL32  .text+0x0000000000009b78
>
> Also there are ABS32 relocations in various .debug_* sections but I
> presume they are handled by --strip-unneeded.

Ah, yes (Fedora also saw this):
https://plus.google.com/u/0/106265217227408958782/posts/RYNT8RwFHDB

While it might be interesting to dig out what causes this toolchain difference
vs. Linaro, I am reasonably confident this relocation cannot be generated
in actual C code with -mcmodel=large. So my suggestion would be to ignore
this relocation. Or should we explicitly strip .eh_frame?

/
    Leif