[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: booting btrfs
From: |
Chris Murphy |
Subject: |
Re: booting btrfs |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:55:01 -0600 |
On Oct 15, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Andrey Borzenkov <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I do not know whether it was the case in the past, but today there is
> *no* difference between using absolute or relative form.
OK so it's confirmed that with kernel 3.2 the subvol= behavior changed from
relative to set-default subvolume to always being absolute whether it starts
with / or not.
And subvolume set-default is intended to affect the mount command absent usage
of subvol option.
So the change needed for GRUB is it should ignore the set-default and always
treat prefix paths as absolute starting from top level 5 subvolume. That makes
things more clear and less complicated and also won't break bootability if the
user wants to e.g. always mount their current home subvolume by default, then
nothing else is affected.
Chris Murphy
- Re: booting btrfs, (continued)
- Re: booting btrfs, Chris Murphy, 2013/10/14
- Re: booting btrfs, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2013/10/14
- Re: booting btrfs, Andrey Borzenkov, 2013/10/14
- Re: booting btrfs, Chris Murphy, 2013/10/14
- Re: booting btrfs, Andrey Borzenkov, 2013/10/15
- Re: booting btrfs, Chris Murphy, 2013/10/15
- Re: booting btrfs, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2013/10/15
- Re: booting btrfs, Chris Murphy, 2013/10/15
- Re: booting btrfs, Andrey Borzenkov, 2013/10/15
- Re: booting btrfs, Chris Murphy, 2013/10/15
- Re: booting btrfs,
Chris Murphy <=
- Re: booting btrfs, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2013/10/14
- Re: booting btrfs, Chris Murphy, 2013/10/14
- Re: booting btrfs, Chris Murphy, 2013/10/14
- Re: booting btrfs, Andrey Borzenkov, 2013/10/14