[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX
From: |
Lennart Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:58:36 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:56:52PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> You don't need an EFI system to give GRUB enough space. You just
> need to partition the drive so the first partition starts at 1MB
> instead of sector 63. I think using a GPT partition scheme is quite
> preferred over the MSDOS scheme designed 30 years ago.
That's true. Does grub-install check the partition table to see how much
room there is before placing itself after the MBR? I haven't checked
that since I tend to use GPT these days.
> I will note that this causes problems for some systems, but I
> haven't seen it since I don't do windows.
--
Len Sorensen
- GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX, Martin Wilck, 2013/02/07
- Re: GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX, Chris Murphy, 2013/02/09
- Re: GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX, Martin Wilck, 2013/02/18
- Re: GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX, Chris Murphy, 2013/02/18
- Re: GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX, Andrey Borzenkov, 2013/02/19
- Re: GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX, Chris Murphy, 2013/02/19
- Re: GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX, Michael Chang, 2013/02/19
- Re: GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2013/02/19
- Re: GRUB and the risk of block list corruption in extX, Chris Murphy, 2013/02/19