Re: [PATCH] Removing nested functions, part one of lots

[Colin Watson]

On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:37:38AM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> В Tue, 1 Jan 2013 14:42:04 +0000
> Colin Watson <address@hidden> пишет:
> >  * If a hook requires more than one local variable from its parent
> >    function, declare "struct <name-of-parent>_ctx" with the necessary
> >    variables, and convert both the hook and the parent to access the
> >    variables in question via that structure.
> 
> Personally I find "ctx" part a bit confusing. It is not really execution
> context in usual sense, it is just collection of random variables. I
> would rather go with "struct <name-of-parent>_data" here.

I'm fine with that (and this is exactly why I posted this for a bit of a
bikeshedding opportunity :-) ).  Vladimir, any opinions on the naming?

-- 
Colin Watson                                       address@hidden