[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EHCI driver
|
From: |
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko |
|
Subject: |
Re: EHCI driver |
|
Date: |
Wed, 30 May 2012 19:40:58 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.4) Gecko/20120510 Icedove/10.0.4 |
On 30.05.2012 19:28, Aleš Nesrsta wrote:
> It is probably not necessary - I think, really there will be "allocated"
> the same total number of QHs during communication by this new algorithm
> as with old algorithm.
> The reason is: Now will be used more "sync. QHs" but less "async.
> QHs" (because some "async. QHs" were "allocated" before to "emulate"
> interrupt transfer via bulk) - so the total sum should be the same now
> as before.
It's not about the used size but about code simplicity and avoiding
iterating through all QHs when not needed. Previously we had only one
type of QHs in one list, now we need 2 and clearly separating them would
make the code simpler.
--
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- EHCI driver, Christer Weinigel, 2012/05/29
- Re: EHCI driver, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2012/05/30
- Re: EHCI driver, Aleš Nesrsta, 2012/05/30
- Re: EHCI driver,
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko <=