grub-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Improve support for genkernel in 10_linux


From: Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
Subject: Re: Improve support for genkernel in 10_linux
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:24:06 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1

On 15.04.2012 04:21, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On 04/11/2012 11:52 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> 2012/4/11 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko <address@hidden>:
>>> On 11.04.2012 04:56, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>>> On 04/07/2012 05:54 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>>>> Secondly, genkernel looks for the "real_root" kernel command line option
>>>>> to determine the root filesystem. This is a holdover from the days when
>>>>> we used true initrd images and we needed to use root=/dev/ram0.
>>>>>
>>>> It was brought to my attention that genkernel's initramfs code will in
>>>> fact utilize "root" if "real_root" is unset. This part of my previous
>>>> patch is therefore pointless.
>>>>
>>>> I have attached a revised patch containing only the changes necessary to
>>>> detect a genkernel initramfs image.
>>>>
>>> pushd/popd isn't POSIX so we can't use it in our scripts. Also I don't
>>> feel like glob expansion is the right thing to use here. Why not infer
>>> the architecture from uname ?
>> That should also work. Here's the logic that genkernel uses to populate ARCH:
>>
>> ARCH=`uname -m`
>> case "${ARCH}" in
>>      i?86)
>>              ARCH="x86"
>>              ;;
>>      mips|mips64)
>>              ARCH="mips"
>>              ;;
>>      arm*)
>>              ARCH=arm
>>              ;;
>>      *)
>>              ;;
>> esac
>>
>> I'm thinking it would be a good idea to rename ARCH to something like
>> GENKERNEL_ARCH. We should also let the user override this in
>> /etc/default/grub.
>>
>> Does that sound ok?
> I have modified my patch to implement what I describe above.
>
What is the reason to make it configurable? There shouldn't be any need
to configure something that is autodetected


-- 
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]