[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Raid5 regression
From: |
Goswin von Brederlow |
Subject: |
Re: Raid5 regression |
Date: |
Thu, 05 May 2011 18:57:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) XEmacs/21.4.22 (linux, no MULE) |
Phillip Susi <address@hidden> writes:
> On 5/4/2011 4:23 PM, Vladimir 'Ï-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>> Ideally by using 1.1 metadata. It's in the end of the device but
>> contains enough data to unambigously tell if it belongs to disk or
>> partition.
>
> You mean 1.0? I guess I'll have to try that.
I just use 1.2, 4k from the start. That is never ambigous.
MfG
Goswin
- Re: Raid5 regression, (continued)
- Re: Raid5 regression, Jérôme Poulin, 2011/05/03
- Re: Raid5 regression, Goswin von Brederlow, 2011/05/04
- Re: Raid5 regression, Phillip Susi, 2011/05/04
- Re: Raid5 regression, Phillip Susi, 2011/05/04
- Re: Raid5 regression, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2011/05/04
- Re: Raid5 regression, Phillip Susi, 2011/05/04
- Re: Raid5 regression, Goswin von Brederlow, 2011/05/04
- Re: Raid5 regression, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2011/05/04
- Re: Raid5 regression, Phillip Susi, 2011/05/05
- Re: Raid5 regression,
Goswin von Brederlow <=