[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Raid5 regression
|
From: |
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko |
|
Subject: |
Re: Raid5 regression |
|
Date: |
Wed, 04 May 2011 22:23:59 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110402 Iceowl/1.0b2 Icedove/3.1.9 |
> So the net result is that even though it always was detecting the
> superblock on both the whole disk and on the partition, it used to let
> the one found on the partition supersede so everything worked, but now
> it keeps the one on the whole disk and so things break.
>
Now it breaks less then previously. Previous behaviour resulted in NULL
dereference in some cases.
> How should this conflict be resolved? I would think that the
> partition should take precedence like it used to.
>
Ideally by using 1.1 metadata. It's in the end of the device but
contains enough data to unambigously tell if it belongs to disk or
partition.
--
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: Raid5 regression, (continued)
- Re: Raid5 regression, Phillip Susi, 2011/05/03
- Re: Raid5 regression, Phillip Susi, 2011/05/03
- Re: Raid5 regression, Jérôme Poulin, 2011/05/03
- Re: Raid5 regression, Goswin von Brederlow, 2011/05/04
- Re: Raid5 regression, Phillip Susi, 2011/05/04
- Re: Raid5 regression, Phillip Susi, 2011/05/04
- Re: Raid5 regression, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2011/05/04
- Re: Raid5 regression, Phillip Susi, 2011/05/04
- Re: Raid5 regression, Goswin von Brederlow, 2011/05/04
- Re: Raid5 regression,
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko <=
- Re: Raid5 regression, Phillip Susi, 2011/05/05
- Re: Raid5 regression, Goswin von Brederlow, 2011/05/05