[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon
From: |
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko |
Subject: |
Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:54:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100805 Icedove/3.0.6 |
On 09/28/2010 08:45 PM, Phillip Susi wrote:
> On 9/28/2010 12:36 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>
>> My branch uses every available sector for redundancy info. So if you
>> have 2*n sectors left in MBR gap you can survive n corrupted sectors.
>>
> You might want to place a reasonable limit on that. With conventional
> 62 sector gaps this could be a good idea, but with everyone moving to 1
> MB gaps these days, over 2000 sectors of ecc could be overkill ;)
>
>
Yes, limit is that redumdance is never longer as the data.
--
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2010/09/25
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Phillip Susi, 2010/09/27
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Colin Watson, 2010/09/27
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Phillip Susi, 2010/09/27
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Lennart Sorensen, 2010/09/27
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Phillip Susi, 2010/09/28
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Colin Watson, 2010/09/28
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2010/09/28
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Phillip Susi, 2010/09/28
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon,
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko <=
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Manoel Rebelo Abraches, 2010/09/27