[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon
|
From: |
Phillip Susi |
|
Subject: |
Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon |
|
Date: |
Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:10:44 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 |
On 9/25/2010 4:25 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Hello, all. I've just finished Reed-Solomon and pushedit to
> branches/solomon. About 8 sectors (including MBR) aren't protected by
> Reed-Solomon. Obviously it can be improved but that would be for post-1.99
So you are adding bit error detection and correction to the boot loader?
You realize that the hard disk already does reed-solomon right? So a
second layer of it doesn't seem to have much point.
- [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2010/09/25
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon,
Phillip Susi <=
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Colin Watson, 2010/09/27
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Phillip Susi, 2010/09/27
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Lennart Sorensen, 2010/09/27
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Phillip Susi, 2010/09/28
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Colin Watson, 2010/09/28
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2010/09/28
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Phillip Susi, 2010/09/28
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2010/09/28
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Manoel Rebelo Abraches, 2010/09/27