Re: [PATCH] Function parameters support

[BVK Chaitanya]

On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Seth Goldberg <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>  This is a *great* start, but can you please add support for $* as well as a
> shift operator (though shift is not as useful when there are no looping
> constructs)

shift command is now available in people/bvk/shift-cmd branch.
Support for $* will be added very soon.

>   Also: Do you think there's value in supporting $0, where that expands to
> the function name?

Yes, but IMO it should be expanded to script name in configfile cases
or to simply "grub" in command line.  This is how BASH seems to behave
(i.e, $0 doesn't expand to function name).  I will add this as a
separate patch because configfile command probably needs to be updated
as well.



thanks,
-- 
bvk.chaitanya