Re: [patch] GRUB possible patches

[Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko]

address@hidden wrote:
>> First part applied
>>     
> Thanks!
>
>   
>> Please don't put unrelated patches into single file. Fast look on the
>> joliet.c of mkisofs suggests that it's not the case for its joliet. It
>> seems there is more to it. Can you find some normative documents?
>>     
>
> I searched a bit and found the following information:
> Doc: http://www.transelectro.ru/technology/standard/joliet_spec.htm
> In the documentation: 
>
> "Simply put, SEPARATOR 1 and SEPARATOR 2 shall be expanded to 16-bits".
>
> SEPARATOR 2 is ';' - which is used signify the version number of a file.
>
> About mkisofs - it seems it's just their implementation of joilet, they can 
> use or not use versioning
> See this topic
> http://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg03199.html
>
>   
Ok, I agree that it should be fixed but I made and applied a slightly
different fix
>> We use only C-style comments
>>     
> Ok, I will create new patch soon
>
>   


-- 
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature