grub-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: On gratuitous modularization


From: Christian Franke
Subject: Re: On gratuitous modularization
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:13:11 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100104 SeaMonkey/2.0.2

Hi Robert,

Robert Millan wrote:

Please be careful when adding modules.  I see that too often new modules
are added without any real need to host this code separately.

There are many examples where this happened.  I just noticed:

commands/hdparm.c:  struct grub_disk_ata_pass_through_parms apt;
commands/hdparm.c:  if (grub_disk_ata_pass_through (disk,&apt))
commands/hdparm.c:  struct grub_disk_ata_pass_through_parms apt;
commands/hdparm.c:  if (grub_disk_ata_pass_through (disk,&apt))
commands/hdparm.c:  struct grub_disk_ata_pass_through_parms apt;
commands/hdparm.c:  if (grub_disk_ata_pass_through (disk,&apt))
commands/hdparm.c:  if (! grub_disk_ata_pass_through)
disk/ata_pthru.c:                      struct grub_disk_ata_pass_through_parms 
*parms)
disk/ata_pthru.c:  grub_disk_ata_pass_through = grub_ata_pass_through;
disk/ata_pthru.c:  if (grub_disk_ata_pass_through == grub_ata_pass_through)
disk/ata_pthru.c:    grub_disk_ata_pass_through = NULL;
include/grub/disk.h:struct grub_disk_ata_pass_through_parms
include/grub/disk.h:extern grub_err_t (* 
EXPORT_VAR(grub_disk_ata_pass_through)) (grub_disk_t,
include/grub/disk.h:               struct grub_disk_ata_pass_through_parms *);
kern/disk.c:grub_err_t (* grub_disk_ata_pass_through) (grub_disk_t,
kern/disk.c:        struct grub_disk_ata_pass_through_parms *);

this seems unnecessary.  ata_pthru is very small.  If it's only used by hdparm,
why not just merge it?  This also avoids the additional code in kernel.


The module ata_pthru.mod exists only to keep ata.mod small, see:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2009-02/msg00091.html

Keeping the ata.mod specific pass-through function separate from hdparm.mod was intentional. Merging this function into hdparm.mod would only make sense if ata.mod will the only ATA access module with pass-through functionality in the future. Hdparm.mod would then depend on ata.mod. A 'hdparm -h' would load ata.mod and disable biosdisk access.

I hope we will eventually have an ahci.mod :-)

BTW: I agree that using a global function pointer 'grub_disk_ata_pass_through' is a hack. A cleaner design would be possible with a grub_disk_dev.ioctl(.) call.

--
Christian Franke





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]