[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] nested partitions
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] nested partitions |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:44:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:43:09AM -0800, Seth Goldberg wrote:
>
> The UEFI specification specifies support for nested MSDOS labels (MSDOS
> labels that include partitions in which another MSDOS partition table can
> be nested). This is not talking just about extended partitions, but
> about the ability to arbitrarily nest MSDOS partition tables. I can't
> point you to a specific implementation that uses that functionality, but
> the fact that it's specified should be enough to allow us to be flexible
> here. Why limit the nesting if architecturally it's not a problem to
> support (as Vladimir's existing implementation already supports arbitrary
> nesting).
Note that it is very easy for Intel to specify and implement that: in their
world there's only one partition label type (plus another one which is
backward compatible with the first).
--
Robert Millan
"Be the change you want to see in the world" -- Gandhi
- Re: [PATCH] nested partitions, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] nested partitions, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2010/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] nested partitions, Robert Millan, 2010/01/24
- Re: [PATCH] nested partitions, Bruce Dubbs, 2010/01/24
- Re: [PATCH] nested partitions, Michal Suchanek, 2010/01/24
- Re: [PATCH] nested partitions, Robert Millan, 2010/01/25
- Re: [PATCH] nested partitions, Robert Millan, 2010/01/25
- Re: [PATCH] nested partitions, Grégoire Sutre, 2010/01/25
Re: [PATCH] nested partitions, Seth Goldberg, 2010/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] nested partitions,
Robert Millan <=