Re: grub_elf32_size()

[Robert Millan]

It seems this just didn't belong to relocator branch.  Nothing to see here ;-)

On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:20:17AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> 
> Not sure if I missed something obvious, but this commit (relocator branch)
> seems to break compilation rather than fix it.  Was grub_elf32_size()
> number of args meant to be changed?
> 
> -- 
> Robert Millan
> 
>   The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
>   how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
>   still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."

> ------------------------------------------------------------
> revno: 1899
> committer: Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko <address@hidden>
> branch nick: relocators
> timestamp: Thu 2009-12-03 22:45:41 +0100
> message:
>   Fix compilation issue for ppc
> 
> === modified file 'loader/powerpc/ieee1275/linux.c'
> --- loader/powerpc/ieee1275/linux.c   2009-06-21 23:55:23 +0000
> +++ loader/powerpc/ieee1275/linux.c   2009-12-03 21:45:41 +0000
> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ grub_linux_load32 (grub_elf_t elf)
>    if (entry == 0)
>      entry = 0x01400000;
>  
> -  linux_size = grub_elf32_size (elf);
> +  linux_size = grub_elf32_size (elf, 0);
>    if (linux_size == 0)
>      return grub_errno;
>    /* Pad it; the kernel scribbles over memory beyond its load address.  */
> @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ grub_linux_load64 (grub_elf_t elf)
>    if (entry == 0)
>      entry = 0x01400000;
>  
> -  linux_size = grub_elf64_size (elf);
> +  linux_size = grub_elf64_size (elf, 0);
>    if (linux_size == 0)
>      return grub_errno;
>    /* Pad it; the kernel scribbles over memory beyond its load address.  */
> 

> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel


-- 
Robert Millan

  "Be the change you want to see in the world" -- Gandhi