[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: my plan for Multiboot 2
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: my plan for Multiboot 2 |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Dec 2009 17:53:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
Robert Millan, le Mon 07 Dec 2009 16:08:31 +0100, a écrit :
> - Release a new revision of Multiboot 1, with only modifications that don't
> alter the spec. I.e. GRUB Legacy continues to be compliant, and we don't
> change the signature. These modifications would basically cope with the
> fact that Multiboot 1 is also usable on non-BIOS platforms, take advantage
> of modern 64-bit types to define equivalent structures, resolve some
> ambiguities, etc.
I'm wondering about the multiboot_mod_list structure & 64bits: would
mod_start/end, cmdline and pad become 64bits?
Samuel
- my plan for Multiboot 2, Robert Millan, 2009/12/07
- Re: my plan for Multiboot 2,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: my plan for Multiboot 2, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/12/09
- Re: my plan for Multiboot 2, Robert Millan, 2009/12/09
- Re: my plan for Multiboot 2, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/12/09
- Re: my plan for Multiboot 2, Robert Millan, 2009/12/09
- Re: my plan for Multiboot 2, BVK Chaitanya, 2009/12/10
- Re: my plan for Multiboot 2, Bogdan, 2009/12/13
- Re: my plan for Multiboot 2, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/12/13
- Re: my plan for Multiboot 2, Robert Millan, 2009/12/24
- Re: my plan for Multiboot 2, Robert Millan, 2009/12/24