|
From: | Bruce Dubbs |
Subject: | Re: meaning of absent --users prameters. |
Date: | Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:30:25 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080722 SeaMonkey/1.1.11 |
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
Hello. Currently authentication system works as following: menuentry "name" --users "a,b,c" { } Means that only superusers and users "a", "b" and "c" are permitted to boot this menuentry. To allow only superusers to boot an entry one would need: menuentry "name" --users "" { } And absence of --users means "anyone can choose this entry". Unfortunately this is error-prone. Does anyone oppose to change it to: No --users: only superusers To have an unlocked entry you have to add --unlocked
First, what is the definition of a 'superuser'? Where does GRUB get the information to make a decision.
In any case, I'd recommend --users: superusers only or even --users: superusers ------- -- Bruce
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |